Dalits

From www.dalitstan.org/books/b...l#superior





Vol.I : Doctrines and Justifications



" Whatever exists in the world is, the property of the Brahmana; on account of the excellence of his origin the Brahmana is, indeed entitled to all. "



-- Manu Smirti I.100
( Manu's Work is the Most Important Law-Book of Hinduism)

Table of Contents
1. Definition & Superiority of the "Brahman Race"
1.1 Definition of The Brahmin Race
1.2 Doctrine of The Superiority of The Brahmin Race
1.3 Race Records
2. Definition of "Brahman Gold"


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ Brahmin Gold Home ] [ Volume I ] [ Volume II ] [ Volume III ] [ Volume IV ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Chapter 1. Definition & Superiority of the "Brahman Race"

Prior to detailing the quantities of Brahmin Gold and the methods utilised in their acquisition, it is necessary to define the terms `Brahmin', `Brahminist', and `Brahmanism'. In this book, the conventional definitions are followed :
`Brahmin' generally denotes any person belonging to the Brahmin race, born into one of its sub-divisions. It is not a professional category (these are denoted as `jati'), but a race (or `varna', meaning `skin color'), for its members do not permit outsiders to join or intermarry with their community. This having been the case for thousands of years, `Brahmin' is essentially a racial term.
`Brahminist' is used to refer to the Brahmins as well as the followers of the 6 orthodox (`astika') religious schools of Brahmanism.
`Brahmanism' is used to refer to the 6 orthodox religious schools that accept Vedic scriptures and the caste system. Colloquially it is used as a blenket term to refer to the religions of Vedism (`Ved Dharma') and its later off-shoot Vaishnavism (`Vaishnava Dharma'). The technical term `Brahmanism' implies a recognition of the racial and ritual superiority of the Brahmin race, and/or the identification of the deity with the Vedic god Brahma or the abstract Brahman, generally identified with Vishnu. The Sudra (Draviian and Dalit) religion of Shaivism is not included in this term.
1.1 Definition of The "Brahman Race"
The term `Brahmin Race' refers to the white-skinned race which dominated and ruled over other Indo-Aryan and non-Aryan races for 2500 years. The main characteristics of the Brahman race are:

Sanskrit Mother Tongue - Sanskrit was the mother tongue of the overwhelming majority of the Brahman race, and still is so, being used at Brahman homes in place of the local vernacular. Indeed, the vernacular influence is forver miniscule, the Brahmin always clings to his Sanskrit.
Aryan Descent - The Brahmans are of the purest Aryan blood in contrast to the Rajputs (who are mainly Scythic and Hellenic) and Vaisyas (who have absorbed much Dardic or Paisaca blood). The Sudras are of Negroid-Australoid stock, whilst the Mughals are of Immigrant Muslim race. The Brahmins are hence the only remaining `Aryans' in South Asia. As a consequence, the divisions between Brahmin and non-Brahmin are of a deep-rooted racial origin, which plays a considerable role in the intensity of the perpetual Brahmin-non-Brahmin conflict.
1.2 Doctrine of the Superiority of The Brahman Race
The Brahmans propagated the following doctrines in the territories subject to their rule:

(1) That Persons of so-called "Brahman Race" or "Brahman Varna" were Intellectually Superior to Other Races or Varnas.

The Brahmans' dogma of the racial superiority of the Brahman Varna or Race (`varna'=`color' or `race' in Sanskrit) was fully elucidated in the Lawbook of Manu, the standard law-book of Hinduism :

" Of created beings the most excellent are said to be those which are animated,; of the animated, those which subsist by intelligence; of the intelligent, mainkind, and of men, the Brahmanas."
-- [ Manu.I.96 ]
(2) That the Brahmans were a `Master Race' and Thus Accordingly Entitled to Subjugate, Exploit, Exterminate or Dominate other `Races' (`varnas') or Peoples.

This doctrine was explicitly stated in the Manu-Smrti :

"As the Brahmana sprang from (Brahman's) mouth, as he was the first-born, and as he possesses the Veda, he is by right the lord of this whole creation ."
-- [ Manu.I.93 ]
The logical consequence of the `master race' dogma was the right of Brahmins to dominate over other `inferior' poples and to acquire their territories. This is disclosed by several statements in `sacred' Brahmanist texts, which state that the entire Universe belongs by birthright to the Brahmins :

" A Brahmana, coming into existence, is born as the highest on earth, the lord of all created beings, for the protection of the treasure of the law."
" Whatever exists in the world is, the property of the Brahmana; on account of the excellence of his origin the Brahmana is, indeed entitled to all ."
-- [ Manu.I.99-100 ]
"The wealth that is stolen by the Brahman tends to well being in the next life ; the wealth that is given to the Sudra tends to Hell." (Sukraniti)
-- [ Tirth.118 ]
" When a learned Brahmana has found treasure, deposited in former (times), he may take even the whole (of it); for he is the master of everything."
" When the king finds treasure of old concealed in the ground let him give one half to Brahmanas and place the (other) half in his treasury."
-- [ Manu.VIII.37-38 ]
" that (money which is given) to Brahmanas is declared to be an imperishable treasure for kings."
-- [ Manu.I.82 ]
In addition, the confiscation of properties of women and Sudras was openly legalised by Vaishnava scriptures :
A wife, a son, and a slave, these three are declared to have no property; the wealth which they earn is (acquired) for him to whom they belong.
A Brahmana may confidently seize the goods of (his) Sudra (slave); for, as that (slave) can have no property, his master may take his possessions.
-- [ Manu VIII.416-417 ]
Thus, the unlawful confiscation of the properties of non-Brahman races was justified and fully sanctioned in the holy scriptures of Hinduism (or Brahmanism), and this act glorified. The Mahabharata states,
"The son of Ita then inquired: Tell me Vayu, to whom the earth, with its wealth, rightfully belongs to the Brahman or the Kshatriya? Vayu replied: All this whatever exists in the world, is the Brahmans property by right of primogeniture : this is known to those who are skilled in the laws of duty. It is his own which the Brahman eats, puts on, bestows. He is the chief of all the castes, the first-born and the most excellent. Just as the woman when she has lost her (first) husband takes her brother-in-law for a second; so the Brahman is the first resource in calamity; afterwards another may arise (Mahabharata)."
-- [ MBh.Saptaparvam, verse, 2755 ] [ cited in Sup ]
Summarising the situation, Swami Dharma Theertha wrote in his classic `History of Hindu Imperialism',
"Probably no other class of persons in any society ever combined in themselves all these advantages so exclusively as the Brahmans. It is equally doubtful if any other aristocratic class has ever exercised their privileges to the detriment of the common people so unscrupulously and for so long a period as these Brahman priests."
-- [ Tirth.113-114 ] [ cited at Sup ]
He further observes,
" No imperial power ever imposed on a weaker people a more ruthless and soul-destroying domination than the Brahmans did on the rest of their fellow citizens, and no race of superior men ever arrogated to themselves such haughty supremacy and false greatness as they have."
-- [ Tirth.163-164 ] [ Sup ]
(3) That the Ideal State was `Brahmavarta', an Ancient State Inhabited Only by Brahmins.

The third dogma of Brahminism was the doctrine of Brahmavarta. As per `sacred' Brahmanist texts, Brahmavarta was a `Holy Land' inhabited only by Brahmins. It is currently located in the region around Kannauj, between the Ganga and Yamuna rivers. It is thought to have once existed about the `Land of the Seven Rivers' (Saptasindhava) and was a supposed Golden State from which all learning and civilization in the world emanated. However, in later times the center of Brahmanism shifted to the Ganges Valley, where Brahmavarta is currently located. Thus, the ideal state conceivable in this framework was one inhabited wholly by Brahmans. This notion was expounded by `Swami' Vivekananda, a staunch supporter of Orthodox Brahmanist Vaishnava dogma of the Vedanta sect, which fanatically upholds the authority of the Veda against all reason and logic:

"And the theory that the Shudra caste were all non-Aryans and they were a multitude, is equally illogical and irrational. It could not have been possible in those days that a few Aryans settled and lived there with a hundred thousand slaves at their command. The slaves would have eaten them up, made chutney of them in five minutes. The only explanation is to be found in the Mahabharat, which says that in the beginning of the Satya Yoga there was only one caste, the Brahmins, and then by differences of occupations they went on dividing themselves into different castes, and that is the only true and rational explanation that has been given. And in the coming Satya Yuga all other castes will have to go back to the same condition."
-- [ Viv.III.293 ]
The logical consequence of this Brahmavarta doctrine is either the cultural genocide of all non-Brahmin peoples, and their enforced Brahmanisation, or the extermination of all non-Brahmans in order to create an ethnically cleansed `New Brahmavarta' free from all non-Brahmans. These two strategies have been the backbone of several Brahmin supremacist organizations throughout the ages. The first strategy of cultural genocide has been carried out for several millenia, and takes the form of lower races or varnas adopting Brahmanic customs and life-styles, whilst discarding the native vernacular in favour of Sanskrit. The more sinister plan of extermination of non-Brahmins is also widely supported. For example, the Brahmin Supremacist RSS distributed a secret circular to its offices (No. 411 / RO 303; 11 / RSS C03) that stated [ RSS_c ]:
" 9. Retardation of physical and mental development of school going children specially Awarnas and Ambedkarites by harmful eatables, through volunteers, vendors and teachers" ...
" 32. Killing of Anti-Hindus and Anti-Brahmins to continue. Disposal of bodies as per direction."
-- [ RSS_c ]
This ideal of Brahmavarta was used as the justification for the collossal democides and exterminations of non-Brahmins (see Vol.II and Vol.III for details).
1.3 Race Records
The Brahmans maintained, and still maintain, detailed racial records proving the purity of their descent. This system was established in the Brahmanicized regions of India. It was, in effect, an alaborate classification of persons deemed to be of Brahman blood, and upon this depended the rights, privileges, and duties of the persons concerned.

In addition, elaborate racial lists were compiled, classifying the different non-Brahman races. People were classified into different groups in the following rigid hierarchy :

Pure-Blooded Brahmans
Non-Brahman Aryans
Non-Aryan Caucasoids, like Greeks (`Yavanas'), Scythians (`Sakas', `Rajputs'), etc.
Mongoloids
Blacks (`Sudras')
These race records maintained in Brahmin-cccupied territories during the Brahmanic Dark Ages (1500 BC - 1000 AD) were the forerunners of the Nazi race registers maintained in Nazi-occupied nations during the Second World War [ IMT ]. Indeed, the Nazi notions of the Aryan race were adopted from Vedic and Vaishnava religions (ie. Brahmanism).
Illustrative of the Brahmans' continued espousal and exploitation of racial dogmas was the discriminatory Vedic legislation which they caused to be enacted in regions subject to their rule. These laws, especially the version enunciated by the Vedic sage Manu, enforced strict segregation of Sudra Blacks from Aryan townships. Later, considerable restrictions were placed on Vaisyas once these races were crushed to the level of Sudras after the disappearance of Sudras from much of North India and the Deccan.

Coincident with this glorication of the Brahman race was the glorification of Brahmavarta, the Land of the Gods. In this sacred land the Upanishads and Brahmans were composed. The only inhabitants of this land were the purest white-skinned Brahmins, and this was supposed to be the golden age for civilization. The Aryan Vaishnavite scriptures uphold this as the ultimate destiny of all states, and the Brahmans have repeatedly tried to attain the status of pure Brahman nations by attempting to exterminate all non-Brahman races. The ideal of Brahmavarta was forever the `holy' justification for large-scale massacres and democides.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ Table of Contents ] [ Definition & Superiority of Brahmin Race ] [ Definition of Brahmin Gold ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Chapter 2. Definition of "Brahman Gold"




"Brahmin Gold" refers to the staggering wealth aquired by the Brahmans through unlawful and questionable means during the `Brahmanic Dark Ages' of Indian History, the 2500 years of Brahman rule in India from 1500 BC to 1000 AD. The illegal means included confiscation, fraud, and human exploitation in the form of forced labour and slavery, and the maintenance of the bulk of Non-Brahmins in a state of abject poverty.
-


The collective properties confiscated, looted and plundered by the Brahmins and mostly hoarded in the temples are referred to as `Brahmin Gold'.

In later times, the mass death of Sudras from overwork, malnutrition and constant religious and racial persecutions led to intense labour shortages in Northern India. Hence, the Brahmins crushed the Aryan Vaishya races to the level of Sudras in order to replace the extinct Sudroids. An indication of the degradation of the Vaishya is the number of rebirths required for a Vaisya and Kshatriya to become Brahmans as described in the later Brahmanic scriptures. Thus, Indra explains to Matanga that :

A Chandella can become a Sudra only after 1000 births.
A Sudra can become a Vaisya only after 30 times that period
A Vaisya can become a Rajanya after 60 times the previous length.
A Rajanya can become a Brahman after 60 times the previous duration.
-- [ MBh.Anu.1901 ff ][ Muir.I.441 ]



________________________


From www.dalitstan.org/books/gowh/gowh6.html






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hindu Scriptural Sanction for Crushing of Women


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 6
Genocide of Women in Hinduism
by
Sita Agarwal

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The `holy' Vedas and other scriptures of Hinduism are essentially a form of barbarism. All the primitive customs of Sati, female infanticide, human sacrifice (purushamedha) and horse sacrifice (ashwamedha) of the blood-thirsty Aryan war-tribes are justified in them. The inhuman treatment meted out to Aryan women in the Vedic Dark Ages is sanctioned in this `religion' of Hinduism.

6.1 VEDIC RELIGIOUS WAR AGAINST WOMEN
The barbaric Vedic Aryan invaders had scarcely any respect for women, who were considered useless as war machines. Hence, female infanticide was common in order to destroy the excess burden of women. During the later Brahmanic Dark Ages, ascetic influence served to demonise women further still in a manner analogous to the European Medieval Ages.
Women in the Vedic period were harshly treated, being viewed as excess ballast in the Aryan war-tribes. They were essentially degraded to the level of mere chattel whose duty was to satisfy the brute lusts of the Aryan murderers, to raise the next generation of butchers and to cook food for these lechers. These Vedic war-tribes also practiced sati (immolation of widows) and female infanticide in order to destroy the excess number of females considered worthless for the Aryan war-machine. Hence, the attitude permeating the Vedas is one of utmost hostility and hatred against women. Women are consistently demonised and compared to animals in the `sacred' Vedas :

" The friendship of women does not last long. Their nature is like that of the hyena." [ Rig Veda 10-95-10 ] [ Periyar ]
" (When creating them) Manu allotted to women (a love of their) bed, (of their) seat and (of) ornament, impure desires, wrath, dishonesty, malice and bad conduct." [ Manu.9.17 ]
" For women no (sacramental) rite (is performed) with sacred texts, thus the law is settled; women (are) destitute of strength and destitute of (the knowledge of) Vedic texts, (are as) impure as falshood (itself) , that is a fixed rule." [ Manu.IX.18 ]
" Day and night women must be kept in dependance by the males (of) their (families), and, if they attach themselves to sensual enjoyments, they must be kept under one's control." [ Manu.9.2 ]
" And to this effect many sacred texts are sung also in the Vedas, in order to (make) fully known the true disposition (of women); hear the expiation of their (sins)." [ Manu.9.19 ]
" According to a verse in Adharvana Veda a wife is given by God to a husband to serve him and to bear him children. Further she is referred to by her husband as his subordinate and slave." [ Periyar cting Adharvana Veda 14.01.52 ]
" No birth is worse than the birth of a woman. Women are the root-cause of all evils " [ Periyar citing the Dharma Shastras ]

Here one can clearly see how Hinduism treats women. They are referred to as hyenas and compared to animals. What true models and guidelines for the good Aryan Hindu in his generous treatment of women !
6.2 VAISHNAVITE PERSECUTION OF WOMEN
Vaishnavism is the religion that grew out of the Vedic religion and became the dominant Brahmanic faith after obliterating Buddhism and Jainism.. It hence inherited the Aryan male chauvinist dogmas of the Vedic religion. It is now the dominant form of the 6 `astika' schools of Brahmanism in existence, for 75 % of all `Hindus' are Vaishnavites.

Hence, the Vaishnava literature (Puranas, Smrtis, etc.) pour venom and hatred against women. Women are generally termed as " thieves", "dacoits", "pirates", " thirsty tigresses" and "hypocrite cats" in the medieval Nath literature. [ Obsc., p.245 ]. The following is only a small list of the vast corpus of poison and hatred spread against womenhood by the bigot Brahmin males :

"A woman's intellect is too deep and too cunning to be grasped by others." [ MBh.Anu.39-8 ] [ Peri ]
" Fire will not be satisfied with any amount of firewood. The sea is not satisfied with any amount of water the rivers bring. A butcher is not satisfied with the slaughter of any number of animals. Similarly women will not be satisfied with any number of men." [ Puranas cited in Peri ]
" Women are capable of producing harm equivalent to the combined effect of poisonous fungus , a tempest, Yama, the god of the underworld, a fire pit that throws out fire continuously, the source of a spring, the sharpness of a razor, strong poison , serpents and fire." [ Mahabharata cited in Peri ]
" A woman will not hesitate to kill her husband or her children or her brothers or any other person in order to fulfil her aim. Women have been mercilessly compared to a tiger and have been ill-treated and disgraced." [ Bagavatha Skundam. 4-14, 42-8, 4-36 ] [ Peri ]
"The following eight qualities are characteristic qualities of women. They are: uttering lies, unsteadiness, deceit, stupidity, greed, impurity, wickedness and rashness." [ Sukra 3-163 ] [ Peri ]
" Valmiki has written that when there was no request from anybody, Rama orally declared that voluntarily and cheerfully he was giving his wife, all that he valued and his right over the administration of the land to Bharata." [ Ramayana 2-19-14 ] [ Peri ]
Hence, Hindu scriptures refer to women as `poison fungi', `tigresses', `thieves' and `pirates'. What an honour for a Hindu woman !
Chaitanya was one of the major `saints' during the medieval period. He spread Vaishnavism in Eastern India, but aroused the opprobation of the Orthodox Aryan-Vaishnavas because he allowed `conversion' from lower castes. Even this `liberal' man had highly negative opinions of women:

"Chaitanya thought it to be a sin to talk, think or even dream of women and that even the sight of a wooden statue of a woman can distract the mind and be responsible for immorality. He advised people to avoid being alone even with their own mother , sister or daughter."
-- [Nand 124-127]
After all, Chaitanya was a Vaishnavite. Note how women are considered the epitome of evil. This is even far worse than primitive Christianity, where women are considered the source of shame. Here are some citations from the `liberal' religion of Hinduism :

` [A Vedic Graduate] should not look at a naked woman.' [Manu 8:453]

`Let a decent man ever avoid by night ... a loose woman' [V.P. Book III Ch. XII p. 250 ]
Indeed, such was the effectiveness of the Brahmin Vaishnava propaganda that women themselves were brainwashed to develop a deep hatred against their gender. Even today, the mother-in-law is often found to be directly responsible for the dowry death of the bride. This is once again, the Brahmin-invented strategy of `Divide and Rule': woman is pit against woman, sister against sister and mother-in-law against daughter-in-law in order to completely divide Indian womanhood into perpetually conflicting groups. This strategy has a long history, and was even in full force during the so-called `Buddhist Age', an era more properly referred to as the Sutric Dark Age. Thus, mistresses showed little regard for their fellow females :

` In the Buddhist Age, a slave-girl who was obliged to sleep with her master, was often deprived of her nose and ears by her mistress and there was no law to protect her.'
-- [ Jain, p.162 ]
6.3 BUDDHISM AND JAINISM : OSTRACIZATION OF WOMEN
Buddhism and Jainism were both protest movements (`Sramanas') against the Vedic Vaishnava system of Brahmanism. However, they did not lead to any major changes in the status of women. This was due to the emphasis placed by these religions on asceticism. Their view of women was similar to the Essenes, Franciscans and other early Christian asetics. Thus, although sati was opposed by these reformers, yet women were considered as hurdles on the path to liberation.
The Buddha was very strict in his insistence on asceticism. He left his home and wife to become attain nirvana and considered women a hindrance to that goal -

"Buddha is said to have induced his disciples not to look at a woman or even talk to her"
-- [ Sacred Books of the East,XI p.91 cited in Bhatt p.44 ]
Jainism greatly discouraged the custom of sati. Devannabhatta, a South Indian scholar of the 12th century AD, opines that the sati system is only an inferior variety of Dharma and, hence should not be encouraged at all [ Vyavaharakanda p.598 ] [ 1200 p.67 ]. The Jains launched a crusade against the custom. As a result of the humaniarian influence of the anti-Vedic Jains, many ladies did not sacrifice themselves as satis but benefitted society by their useful work. Examples of queens who continued as widows due to the humanitarian influence of Jainism are [ 1200, p.67-68 ]:
Prthviraja III's mother Karpuradevi
Queen Lahini, younger sister of Purnapala
Widow of the king Vigraraja
Mayanalladevi, mother of Siddharaja Jayasimha
Nayika, the mother of Mularaja II and Bhimadeva II
Kuberu's mother in the Moharaja Parajaya
The 2 queens of the Kalachuri dynasty, Alhanadevi & Gosaladevi, who helped their sons in the matters of state.
As a result of `nastik' (heterodox) Jain and Buddhist influence, some Vedic Brahmanic scriptures make statements against sati, but these are very rare and did not have any impact. Thus the Srstikhanda of the Padma Purana clearly forbids a Brahmana widow to become a sati and declares that any person, who will help a Brahmana widow to the funeral pyre, will be guilty of the most dreadful sin of the murder of a Brahmana [ Padma 49.73-74 ] [ 1200, p.67 ] This citation shows that sati in the later Brahmanic Dark Ages was a Brahmanic custom enforced upon the masses, whilst Brahmani widows were not subject to this barbarity . The Aryan Brahmins enforced this upon the non-Brahmin races in order to obliterate non-Brahmin races.
Divorce was known to the Jainas, as evident from the accounts of Prince Simha in Jinesvara's `Kathasoprakarana' and Viradhavala in the Prabandhachintamani [ 1200 p.65 ] [ Suri p.47-50 ]

6.4 LIBERAL SUDRA SHAIVISM
Dravidian women enjoyed much greater freedom than their Aryan counterparts.
6.5 LIBERATION OF WOMEN UNDER ISLAM
Contrary to Brahmin fanatic propaganda, Islam acted as a liberating force for women. The custom of seclusion of women in Islam was far milder than that practiced by the pre-Islamic Hindus and Persians :
`In Persia also seclusion of women was common before the Christian era.'
-- [MPS p.87]
Moreover, Mughal caliphs abolished the custom of sati.

6.5 `LIBERAL' BHAKTI CULTS & OPPRESSION OF WOMEN
One of the frauds perpetrated by the Brahmin-controlled media is to portray the so-called `bhakti' cults as liberal with regard to women. While opposing sati, these cults in fact maintained the abyssmal status quo from the Vedic Dark Ages. The severe ascetism encouraged by these cults was itself the result of hatred against women. The cult of Nath Siddhas remain celibate throughout their life for no other reason than aversion towards women. In this `liberal cult', women are regarded as the greatest danger in the parth of yoga and they are given no status higher than that of `ferocious tigresses bent upon sucking the blood of the prey'. [ Obsc 244 ]

The Gorakhnathis are another cult that wraps the poison of Brahmanism in another veil in order to fool the non-Brahmins. Thus, the `exalted' Guru Gorakhnath, the person after whom this sect is named, stated,

"The breath of a woman dries up the body and youth vanishes day by day. Foolish are the people who understand nothing and make pets of the tigresses in every house, in the day the tigress becomes the world-enchantress and in the night she dries up the whole body."
-- Goraksha-vijaya, pp.186-7 [ cited in Obsc 244 ]
[ cf also Dharma-mangala of
Sahadev BSPP 1304, Goraknath's sayings ]


Gorakhnath further said this about women :

"You have given over your store to the gang of dacoits, you have employed the mouse as guard for the pepper plant and the cat for thickly boiled milk; you have kept logs of wood in the custody of the carpenter, the cow to the tiger, wealth to plunderers, the frog to the serpents ... dry fuel to the fire."
- Goraksha-vijaya p.121-3
Gopi-candra. Pancamala p.340-1 [ Obsc 245 ]


Mayanamati was a woman who wanted ot save her son from the clutches of his wives. Accordingly she said the following : " A lioness is she [ woman ] and casts her eyes like the tigress; she leaves aside the bones and the flesh and sucks up the Maharasa [semen in a grosser sense]." [ Obsc 246 ] [ Gopicandrer Sannyas (CU Part II) p.438 ]. This displays the common attitudes against women had even affected the women themselves, so that they again brainwashed others.

The attitude of the Nath school towards women influenced the concepts of the Nirguna school and in turn corrupted Kabir. All the retrograde statements made by these persons can be directly traced to barbarian Hinduism.
6.6 INCEST IN HINDUISM : HINDU ABUSE OF WOMEN
In order to permanently destroy the genetic stock of the non-Brahmin races the Brahmins enforced the depravities of child-marriage and incest upon the non-Brahmins. These customs led to genetic defects and mutations in the offspring as a result of consanginuity. Hence, incest is more common in Aryan Hindu society than in any other part of the world. References to this practice in ancient Indian literature abound. Often the girls were unwilling, but were then forced by their brothers/fathers to submit to the lecherous desires of the fanatic Aryan Hindu male. The strict Hindu, Buddhist and Jain emphasis on ascetism also played a role in the spread of this Hindu perversion. The main reason, however, was Brahmin imperialism. In addition to permanently degrading the genes of the non-Brahmins, this practice permitted the lecherous Brahmins to rape their daughters and hence help satiate their tremendous sexual apetite.

References to incest abound even in the Rg Veda, showing that the perversion of brother-sister incest was introduced by the Aryan savages who invaded India :

`Lord' Krishna lived in incest with his sister Subhadra, sharing her with his brother Balarama [ Mah.wh.153 ]. "In the festivals of that God [ Jagannath ], the 3 images of Krishna, his brother Balarama, and his sister Subhadra, are brought prominently forward; and the populace do not fail to heap reproaches upon Krishna, and upon his sister likewise, for having indulged in a criminal intimacy" [ Mah.wh 153 ]. Again,
" In the older tradition, Subhadra [ Krishna's sister ] is said to have lived in criminal intimacy with both her brothers. This tradition is universally known and believed by the people in spite of the story of the marriage of Subhadra [ to Arjun ]; and the Mussalmans frequently taunt the Hindus with the fact. The Pundits reconcile the stories by a fiction of there having been two Subhadras. As to Krishna's proceedings, they are expalined away as Maya, or delusion."
-- [ Mah.wh.153 ]
The Vedic Pushan is the lover of his sister [ Rg Ved VI.55.4 ] [ Apte 11 ]. No wonder so many Hindus have intercourse with their sisters !
The Aryan God Agni is the lover of his own sister [ Rg Ved X.3.3 ] [ Apte 11 ]. A true model for all Aryans !
Ashvins are referred to as the sons of Savitar and Ushas who are brother and sister [ Apte 11 ]. No doubt many pious Arya Hindus are the offspring of siblings.
The Ashvisns married Surya and Savitri who is their sister [ RV I.116.19 ].
Agni is the son of his father and his sister [ Rg Ved.I.91.7 ]
Yama wards off his sister Yami, saying marriage between brother and sister is forbidden [ Rg.V.X.10 ] [ Apte 11 ]. This is the first indication that the Aryans had at least some moral sense ! However, this verse is evidently a later interpolation.
Father-daughter incest occurs in the famous story of Prajapati (later identified with Brahma, in turn incorporated as an incarnation of Vishnu) and his daughter [ RV III.31.1-2 ]. Moreover, this act was punished. Prajapati is thought to have done something wrong, and Prajapati was pierced by Agni as a punishment [ Sat.Br. XIII.9 ] [ Apte 63 ]. This shows that a slight sense of wrongness of the deed did exist amongst the Aryan savages. However, it was, and still remains, a widely prevalent practice in Hindu society. The punishments meted out to the incestous gods are of little consequence and are probably later Brahmin fabrications designed to wash away the embarassing episodes.

It is evident that the strict laws on male-female relations led to the repression of normal practies and played a role in the rise of various perversions like brother-sister incest, father-daughter incest etc. Strict ascetism always leads to the rise of perversions. Even to this day incest of varying degrees (cross-cousin, father-daughter, mother-son, brother-sister, etc.) is extremely common amongst the Indo-Aryans. No other race on earth has ever recorded such a prevalance of this practice. Just as sodomy has its home in Persia, Lesbianism in ancient Lesbos, so incest has its home amongst the Indo-Aryans.


6.6 FREEDOM OF WOMEN IN SHAKTISM AND TANTRISM
There were exceptions to the rule, even during the Vedic Dark Ages following the collapse of the Indus civilization. Eastern India (Purvadesha), including Bengal, with its majority Mon-Khmer population, was only slightly Aryanized. The Shakti cult (mother-goddess) predominated (75 % of all the idolatrous population is sill Shaktis), and women here had a much higher degree of freedom. Thus for instance they were not required to wear the veil. Shakti (or Tantric) cults involved the worship of women, and the acceptance of their supremacy. Needless to say, the Shakti cult was only limited to Bengal and Assam.

Worship of mother-goddesses was prevalent, and inculculated a spirit of independance amongst Shakta and Tantric women. By contrast, Brahmanic Hindu goddesses were designed to inculculate obedience and subservience to men.
The Tezpur grant states that women in Assam even bathed in the open [ 1200, p.71 ].
Bengali widows used to inherit the issueless husband's entire property [ 1200 p.70 ] [ `Dayabhaga' of Jimutavahana sect XI ]
However, Aryanisation in the 6-7th centuries led to the extermination of the indigenous Tantra and Shakta faiths. The arrival of Brahmanism (ie. astik Hinduism) led to a consequent decline in the status of women. The Dravidian women were also freeer. Malabar was a center of the Tantric form of the Shiva-Shakti cult, and matriarchal customs still prevail. Till recently, polyandry existed.

Besides these two islands, the rest of India confirmed to the picture given above. This lasted until the establishment of the Islamic Califate of Mughalstan in the 12th century AD. Muslims came to form more than 50 % of the population of Mughalstan (the Indus-Ganges valley), and under Islam the status of women improved considerably.

6.7 HINDUISM'S WAR AGAINST WOMAN
In modern times the degradation of womens' status is related to the rise in Hindu Fundamentalism (in actual fact a thinly disguised form of Aryan Vaishnava Fanaticism). The extremist organizations that comprise the Sangh Parivar (BJP, RSS, Bajrang Dal, Ranvir Sena, VHP etc.) are reviving the practice of Sati, dowry, female infanticide etc. in various parts of India. Thus, in modern times the status of women has declined sharply due to the activities of Hindu (ie. Aryan) Fundamentalist organizations.

Gandhi's insistence on strict vegetarianism and celibacy among his disciples was in keeping with the traditions of Vaishnava ascetic ethics [EB 20:528:2a] Gandhi ordered many of the erotic temple sculptures of India to be destroyed. This apostle was also responsible for keeping women enslaved to the Brahmin yoke.

As an indication of the modern degradation of womens' status inflicted by the Brahminist regime in South India, consider the following figures for the number of females per 1000 males in the age group of 0-6 years was


India 954
Tamil Nadu 948
Salem 849
Dharmpuri 905
Madurai 918
-- [ Tam ]

In fact, the figure for Tamil Nadu was the lowest in India. Foeticide is now a modern alternative [ Tam ]. but burial alive, suffocation and starvation are safer methods to circumvent the law [ Tam ].

" The ignominious Shiv Sena (SS) and its "Hitler" Bal Thackeray have been openly supportive of dowry-based male-domineering marriage. Some leaders of RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the parental organization of BJP) and its religious wing VHP (Vishwa Hindu Parishad) have been supportive of the infamous now outlawed "suttee" system. SS and RSS through their political fronts are now ruling the most economically prosperous Indian states such as Maharashtra and Gujarat. "
-- [ Dowry ]
The status of women is hence likely to decline further with the rise of neo-Brahmanism. The only way Indian women can fight the menace is to fight Hinduism itself. The oppression of women is only another manifestation of South Asia's eternal Brahmin problem. By allying with various anti-Brahmin movements, womens' status can be improved.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<< Previous Chapter ] [ Table of Contents ] [ Next Chapter >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE END

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------