Monday, March 06, 2006

Response to Pastor Harry on Iraq and Bush

*I usually don't respond to Pastor Harry here, but I have to since I strongly disagree with him on Iraq. Harry is against the death penalty when Jesus Christ said in Revelation that he who kills with the sword must be killed with the sword. The death penalty was mentioned before the Mosaic Law anyway. He also utilizes the Bible Codes, which aren't 100% accurate and God is apparent not hidden. He supports the Passion movie when David Cloud, Watch Unto Prayer, Cutting Edge, and other ministries have exposed its pornographers, unbiblical scenes, and occult symbolism before [i.e. Icon Publications funded the film and it's logo is the All Seeing Eye of Horus or Lucifer]. Harry is right to oppose abortion and support Terri Schiavo plus exposing blatantly apostate "Christians" like Benny Hinn, Billy Graham, Joyce Meyer, and many others. Here's my response. My words are in bold.

______________

IRAQ: THE REAL REASON FOR WAR The Liberal "Puppet" Show wants us to believe that President Bush invaded Iraq for Oil. The latest accusation of Cindy Sheehan is that "Bush went to war to kill American Soldiers" . . . as human sacrifices? The real reason that President Bush invaded Iraq is three-fold: 1). To Stop Saddam from developing or acquiring nuclear weapons before the year 2012, when Earth may be threatened by a massive comet or astreroid (WHAT NASA CANNOT TELL US).


Response: Once again Pastor Harry is into deception. George W. Bush is working with extremists in the American government who don't have American interests in heart. They seek to illegally drive Saddam out to force democracy into the populace. Harry needs to realize that the Iraq War was illegal since Article 1, Section 8 forbids declaring war without Congressional Declaration. Bush used Resolutions and not a Declaration of War by Congress. This is beyond "liberal" since many real conservatives oppose the Iraq war like Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, Johnson, and many other people. It's obvious that oil isn't the only reason for war, but even the BBC reported that America seeked Iraqi oil in the war. The neo-cons' The Project for an American Century Document document the reasons for the Iraq War as extending their hegemony worldwide. Even a note sent by a Neo-Con to Bill Clinton in the 1990's expressed concern over Iraq's oil supplies and seek to inspire Clinton to invade Iraq.

You should have more compassion for Cindy Sheehan since she is a grieving mother who is right I might add on the issue of Iraq being immoral and carried out improperly. I don't know Bush's heart, but the administration certainly made mistakes and seek to continue to see dead soliders for even years to come. You're reasons for the Iraq War is as bogus as Bush being an authentic conservative. Also, Saddam never had massive quantites of WMDS and he had no nuclear weapons. Many nations are acquiring and developing nukes like India and Pakistan, but we don't invade them. You parrot the same lie that the Neo-Cons keep on showing. You need to becareful of date setting for if it doesn't come to pass, the Bible Code is proven wrong again as the Bible Code mentioned a disaster in 2000, but nothing occured.

2)To Liberate The Iraqi People from a brutal Dictatorship that included Support of terrorism, Mass Murder, Torture and Gang Rape.


Response: What right do we have to illegally invade a Nation. Nations globally have dictators, torture, crime, gang rape, terrorism, etc. like North Korea, Sudan, and many other places. That doesn't mean we invade them all. We have no right to be the policeman of the world, unless you want to embrace a globalist mindset of internationalism. We are a soverign country, not an empire builder at all. The primarily reason for invasion is for a direct direct to our soil and Iraq wasn't that threat. In fact, many American troops have tortured citizens. Now, Iraq is far from being liberated like inside America we have illlegal laws all over the place. If we in America have anti-civil liberty laws, how can we truly liberate Iraq completely. It's apparent that we imposed a new government there. http://www.prisonplanet.com/archive_iraq_aftermath.html#myth is a link proving the falsehood of true Iraqi liberation.

3) To (hopefully) stabilize the heart of the mideast with a Democratic Form of Government. The worst mistake that The USA could make is to withdraw our Military from Iraq. This will result in a violent civil war led by Al Qaeda terrorists and possibly bring OSAMA BIN LADEN to power in Iraq as the new leader. Listen to my new Interview on DoomsDay Talk radio on how Bin Laden may emerge as the new leader of Iraq and trigger an Economic Collapse in the USA, using Oil as the new weapon of terrorism. Pastor Harry/Church of Philadelphia-Internet
www.satansrapture.com

Response: The Middle Eastern region is not fully stabilize after the War. To be honest with you, the Middle East didn't get more violent or less violent in my mind. It remained the same, except with the insurgent terrorizing American G.I.s and Iraq becoming a honest nest of terrorism. As for a democratic government, we aren't a democracy. We are a Republic with elected officals. A democracy is mob rule with the majority ruling all of the voting situation. A democracy leds to choas, but a Republic is for the political stability and governmental fairness inside this country. Obviously, the Founding Fathers condemned the proposition to create a democracy as the basis for our form of government. I hope Iraq becomes a Republic without illegal interventions by foreign nations. Many people to oppose the war, don't believe in an immediate withdraw of troops. I do believe in an eventual withdraw with steps and a time table. We will have to withdraq our troops someday since that's the nature of most wars. That's common sense.

Al-Qaeda is nothing more than a military industrial complex creation as said by Alex Jones and numerous other individuals. Al-Qaeda was funded by the CIA for decades. Osama might be dead and in this "war" on terror, there has always been an exaggeration of terror threats to America. Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein were assisted by the CIA for decades. Saddam worked with the CIA as early as 1959, so Harry's sceanario is faulty. There is a threat of civil war with or without our troops in Iraq like the Constitution controversy and the Sunnis refusing to adhere to the proposal. I have faith in God and I don't embrace fear-mongering or illegal, immoral wars like Iraq with our G.I.s and civilians killed, D.U. poisoning, and other negative activities. Pastor Harry's link of his blog is at http://www.satansrapture.blogspot.com/

By TruthSeeker24

No comments: